Opt-Out Dystopia (Assigned Post 2)

 From the scattered and polite applause, it was clear that few in the Great Hall knew who she was. Stenton gave her a stiff hug, and as she stood beside him, her hands clasped in front of her, he continued. “For those of you who need a civics refresher, Congress Woman Santos represents this very district. It’s okay if you didn’t know her. Now you do.” (p. 208)

The Circle depicts an opt-out dystopia. That is to say, characters have a choice of whether they want to participate in the nightmare or not. Mae and her colleagues certainly do. Mercer and Mae’s parents do not. “If things continue this way, there will be two societies—or at least I hope there will be two—the one you’re helping to create, and an alternative to it. You and your ilk will live, willingly, joyfully, under constant surveillance,” says Mercer (p. 370). This is somewhat a-typical for a dystopian society. George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four is certainly not an opt-out dystopian society. SPOILER ALERT Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World depicts a non-opt-out dystopia, until the very end when we find out that there actually is a way to leave. Gamer is not an opt-out dystopia, as Tillman and his peers have no choice but to fight. But unlike protagonists of these other dystopian works, Mae seems disturbingly enthusiastic about what is happening to her.

Hellishly oppressive governments are something we expect in this genre. Thus the absence of government in The Circle sends a powerful message. Eggers rarely mentions the United States, or any other, government. When he does it is usually to point out the incompetence of politicians, or to note how the circlers believe transparency will help fix government. It makes sense that the government of a dystopia based on today’s USA would feature a largely irrelevant government. We are living in a time when government seems unable to address our most pressing social, economic and environmental problems. Why would any of the circlers recognize their own congresswoman?

In this passage, Eggers perfectly captures the relationship between millennial and Congress. Usually this level of political apathy is met with eye rolling. But here no one is blaming our circlers. The government has become obsolete. Their ignorance is not chided. “It’s okay,” Stenton tells them. When the circlers want to engage in political activity they send zing and smiles to support and denounce movements they know little about (e.g. the “We Hear You Ana María” petition on page 244). Enact change through government has become passé.

The government seems to follow the lead of the circle. The circle’s invention of “transparency” puts pressure on government officials to participate in this phenomenon (see page 240). Note that it is not the other way around. Transparency is not something the government has commissioned. Instead, the government is following the lead of technology. This seems to be the pattern today. Our politicians are obligated to use social media to connect with constituents. Some find this to be a valuable tool and I’m sure others do not. But either way, our government officials are expected to use outside technology. In a similar vein, vast amounts of personal internet data were not created intentionally to be monitored by the NSA (or maybe they were!). Instead, the creation of this data is something the NSA happened to be able to take advantage of. It makes sense that a failing and stagnant government would follow the lead of a cutting-edge private internet enterprise. That’s the way it works in both the circle and in our world. The government goes where technology leads it.

Thus without the standard tyrannical dystopian government, there is nothing forcing our characters to comply. We can have both our “Mercers” and our “Maes.” But the absence of this government does feel a bit strange. Especially since every other aspect of the novel fits the Orwellian paradigm so neatly. This all reflects the statement Eggers is trying to make about the current state of our government.

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Opt-Out Dystopia (Assigned Post 2)

  1. vespoli57 says:

    The government does go with the evolution and changes of times as does a society as changing norms and ideas grow into a new national mindset. The government in The Circle isn’t necessary being controlled by technology but is more or less meeting the demands of the public. If you go back to the novel, the computers are not the ones pressuring the congressman to go transparent but by major public appeal. The people judged the congressmen who weren’t transparent as shady and this brings the technological demand to the forefront. I would say that Eggers could be referencing a “Big Brother is Watching You” type idea with the surveillance idea of the cameras, but that is not being presented much as a government type resource as much as a recreational one.

    Like

    • devilzadv0k8 says:

      I think you may have misunderstood me, or maybe I wasn’t clear enough. I didn’t mean to imply that computers themselves are pressuring the government. Computers are not sentient in this novel. What I meant was that technology and culture are what influence government, not the other way around. You’re exactly right that the reason representatives go clear is because it has major public appeal. What I mean is that government seems to follow the lead of technology.

      I absolutely would also agree that Eggers is referencing Nineteen Eighty-Four’s concept of “Big Brother.” But part of my point is that it’s not a government imposed “Big Brother,” but rather something that people choose to participate in. This is Eggers’ way of sending a message about the role of government today.

      Like

  2. exelsisxax says:

    I’ve also noticed this conspicuous absence of an actual government. I think it’s wholly intentional on Eggers’s part. What better way to make the Circle as insular as possible? Everyone is usually just talking about politics as that messy stuff that happens over yonder, except when it involves the Circle. The only mentions we get are when politicians go transparent or when they dare challenge the Circle. It’s freaky that what is going on with the group of people that decides what happens to hundreds of millions of people is a lower priority than attendance at a Portugal enthusiasts party.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. estraussman says:

    I perceive the circle as a dystopia in the works. You have yet to be introduced to any negative effects, as the circle is too young to have enacted a permanent societal change. But throughout the novel you get wisps of the crimes the circle participates in.

    Like

  4. danwillisdan says:

    Governments are sort of social cabooses, in that they’re wary, always the last to back a particular movement or adopt a particular technology. In many ways, this inertia prevents the government from making rash decisions, whether they’re using not-yet-waterproof technology to secure data or allowing their power to be co-opted by activists for causes whose relevance may already be receding. The Circle, on the other hand, is almost reckless in their adoption of new techniques, technologies, and causes. Maybe this is the distinction Eggers is making, and its the desire of politicians to not seem out-of-touch that is forcing them to partner with the Circle despite the fact that they run at entirely different speeds.

    Liked by 2 people

    • danwillisdan says:

      I should say the American government is wary. Not sure if this trend exists elsewhere.

      Like

    • devilzadv0k8 says:

      I think you’re right about them being social cabooses. I do wonder whether the opposite would be true of a more powerful and capable government. Our own weak and grid-lock government certainly isn’t making too many “rash decisions.” Perhaps if we had a more active state our government would play more of a role in commissioning new technologies, funding research etc.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s